Head to Head
JBL Tune 520BT Wireless On-Ear Headphones vs Skullcandy Crusher Evo Wireless Bass Headphones
A side-by-side comparison of specs, price, and where each one wins.
Specs, side by side
| Feature | JBL Tune 520BT Wireless On-Ear Headphones | Skullcandy Crusher Evo Wireless Bass Headphones |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $39.93 | $109.99 |
| Battery life | Up to 57 hours (claimed) | Up to 40 hours + rapid charge |
| Bluetooth version | Bluetooth 5.3 | — |
| Speed charge | Short charge for several hours of playback (exact ratio undisclosed) | — |
| Water/sweat resistance | No IP rating disclosed | — |
| Build materials | Plastic housing and headband | Mostly plastic housing, foam headband |
| Haptic bass slider | — | Adjustable, physical dial |
| Active noise cancellation | — | Not included |
| Personal Sound hearing test | — | App-based, free |
JBL Tune 520BT Wireless On-Ear Headphones
Budget Bluetooth that gets battery life and comfort right. The build quality and the missing ANC are where the money went.
Best for: Casual listeners, commuters, students, and anyone who wants long battery life and decent bass without spending over $100.
Read the full review →Skullcandy Crusher Evo Wireless Bass Headphones
Bass you feel through your skull, plus battery life that outlasts far pricier rivals. Build materials and the missing ANC are what you trade for it.
Best for: Bass-first listeners, gym-goers and commuters who want long runtime and don't need noise cancelling or studio-flat sound.
Read the full review →